Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Napton et al v. Mills et al
as 1:2026cv01013
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert Napton and Lacey Jean Napton
Defendant:
Deputy Bryan Mills, Deputy Bryan Gordon, Deputy Tony Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GORDON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2026cv09309
Plaintiff:
TERRY GORDON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dominick v. Gordon et al
as 3:2026cv07654
Plaintiff:
Anthony-Jr. Dominick
Defendant:
Steve Gordon, Sean Duryee and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Richey
as 26-2017
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SARAH RICHEY, COREY WADE, RACHEL GORDON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
