Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hines v. Signature Payroll Services, LLC
as 8:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Michelle R Hines
Defendant:
Signature Payroll Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Keeley v. Hines
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keeley
Defendant:
Sheriff David R. Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Payne v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
C Ryan Payne
Defendant:
David R. Hines, Jonathan B Jones, James Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
BERRY v. DRIGGERS
as 3:2023cv24747
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KLEINS BERRY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A DRIGGERS and R HINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C. et al v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
J. C., L. C., Luis Catalan Reyes and others
Defendant:
David R. Hines, Thomas M. Woody, Rickey Dandridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatcher v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hatcher and Jonathan D. McGill
Defendant:
David R. Hines and The County of Hanover, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
HINES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12920
Plaintiff:
ALFRED R. HINES and BRENDA S. HINES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. Sinnen
as 1:2019cv01247
Defendant:
Tina E. Sinnen
Plaintiff:
Antonio R. Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturkey v. Wilson et al
as 7:2018cv01558
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Sheriff Taylor, B George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Conmed, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Cyle J. Moore
Defendant:
Conmed, Inc. , Conmed, LLC , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
