Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lawson v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2026cv04144
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Michael Lawson
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOGLE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2026cv00329
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH FOGLE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FLETCHER and SGT MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. ROGERS, et al.,
as 1:2026cv00653
Plaintiff:
TONY L. HARRIS-BEY
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, JAMES SECOR, III, DAVID CHURCHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv08277
Plaintiff:
JO ANN MADDOX and ROBERT MADDOX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maddox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv01432
Plaintiff:
Paris Monique Maddox
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Aldana et al v. Shaikhet al
as 8:2026cv01745
Plaintiff:
Miguel Aldana, Daniel Banachowski, Thomas Beckum and others
Defendant:
Zan Shaikh and Bright Vision Distribution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Tamie Maddox v. Conopco Inc
as 26-2458
Plaintiff:
TAMIE MADDOX
Defendant:
CONOPCO INC, DBA Unilever Home & Personal Care USA
Marcus Maddox v/ Nathanjah Breitenbach, et al
as 3:2026cv00437
Petitioner:
Marcus Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Estepp v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2026cv00717
Plaintiff:
Cody Tanner Estepp
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Damon Hininger, Patrick Swindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
