Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Nettles v. State of Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Doris Ann Nettles
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Government, Melanie Taylor Jefferson d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee, Joedae L. Jenkins d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrise et al v. Harrington et al
as 3:2022cv01743
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Morrise and Sara Marie Genta
Defendant:
Kathryn Harrington, Nafisa Fai, Pam Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Rogers v. Mcpherson et al
as 3:2021cv01686
Plaintiff:
Mr. Clarence R. Rogers
Defendant:
Aprilla D. Mcpherson, Clarence Rogers, Donald R. Mcpherson and others
Rogers v. Hacker et al
as 3:2020cv01116
Plaintiff:
Mr William R. Rogers and William R. Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Wells and Gregory Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Von Nida et al
as 3:2020cv00322
Defendant:
Chris Slusser and Mark A Von Nida
Plaintiff:
William R. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schoonover v. Rogers et al
as 1:2018cv00302
Plaintiff:
Brendon Schoonover
Defendant:
K. R. Rogers , Kate Arnold, Mike Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Rogers et al
as 1:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
Tabassum F. Garrison
Defendant:
Michael R. Rogers and National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers v. Rodham Clinton et al
as 1:2016cv10408
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Chambers
Defendant:
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, Timothy Tim Kaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
