Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Roy v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12103
Defendant: Vita A. Cassese, John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Isabelle Roy
Steven Whitten, et al v. CIR
as 19-72401
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN R. WHITTEN, MARGUERITE WHITTEN
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
PARIKH v. RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17607
Defendant: JOHN R. WHITTEN, RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JEFFREY A. AUKERMAN and others
Plaintiff: NIRAV PARIKH
Stein v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Plaintiff: William Stein
Defendant: John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Jeffrey A. Aukerman and others
Rosenblatt v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01559
Defendant: Nanometrics Incorporated, John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jordan Rosenblatt
Stein v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01550
Defendant: John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Jeffrey A. Aukerman and others
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Whitten v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02076
Defendant: Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: John Whitten
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Antwon Whitten v. Atif Atyia
as 19-6481
Defendant: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELMONT HEALTH SYSTEMS, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEALTH SERVICES
Defendant / Appellee: ATIF ATYIA, Medical Doctor Lonesome Pine Hospital, LESLIE FLEMING, Warden Wallens Ridge State Prison, DR. ROSE DULANEY, WRSP Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTWON WHITTEN
Leonard-Whitten v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00121
Plaintiff: Gloria Leonard-Whitten, C R Bard Incorporated
Defendant: Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Hormel et al
as 5:2018cv01256
Defendant: FNU Boynston, Rick Whitten, W Clay and others
Plaintiff: Jonathan R Thomas
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?