Cases 51 - 60 of 428
United States Department of Labor v. Ghosn et al
as 5:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor and R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Samir Ghosn and The Chateau of Lawton Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta vs. Robert Walton, Jr. et al.
as 2:2019cv00926
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Robert Walton, Jr. and HADSELL CHEMICAL PROCESSING SIMPLE IRA PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Trans Express, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01423
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Trans Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Durbins of Manteno, Inc., et al
as 1:2019cv01653
Defendant:
Two-Toms, Inc, Henry's Dod-Sons, Inc, Durbins and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Acosta v. Good et al
as 3:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
William H Winn, Jr, Steven Matthew Good, Smartcore LLC Group Health Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
v. Acosta et al
as 3:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Smartcore LLC, William H Winn, Jr, R. Alexander Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. AA to ZZ Child Care and Learning Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00372
Defendant:
AA to ZZ Child Care and Learning Center, Inc., Ryan Zimmerman and Ashleigh Zimmerman
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Acosta v. Sin City Investment Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00361
Defendant:
Leland Keith Ozawa, American Leak Detection Simple IRA Plan and Sin City Investment Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Acosta v. TLC Company, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00158
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
TLC Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Tara Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10369
Defendant:
Pedro Pirez and Tara Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
