Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Trujillo v. Landmark Media Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Roberto Trujillo
Defendant:
Landmark Media Enterprises, LLC, Dominion Enterprises, Inc., Frank Batten, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Selective Ins Co Of S.C. v. Davida Sullivan, et al
as 15-6187
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Intervenor - Appellant:
JAMES R. BLAKE
Defendant:
DAVIDA D. SULLIVAN
Haney et al v. Blake et al
as 2:2015cv01347
Plaintiff:
Bryan Haney and Sam Hogue
Defendant:
Hughie R Blake, Kelly Blake, Marine Star, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kalu Kalu v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc, et al
as 15-1427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALU ORJI KALU
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, P. JUSTER, SSIM, Federal Bureau of Prisons, SCOTT R. BLAKE, Asst. Field Office Director, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Immigrantion and Customs Enforcement and others
Blake v. Montgomery County Jail
as 4:2014cv02807
Plaintiff:
Terry R Blake
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Bennett et al
as 1:2014cv02476
Plaintiff:
Donta Vaughn
Defendant:
Ray Bennett, Stephanie R. Blake, The State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quest Nutrition, LLC v. Board of Supervisors of LSU Agricultrual and Mechanical College, a Louisiana organization et al
as 2:2014cv02005
Defendant:
Ronald Anderson, Ronald Anderson, Scott Angelle and others
Plaintiff:
Quest Nutrition, LLC
Blake v. KT Pro Tools, LLC d/b/a King Tony America
as 1:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Basil R. Blake
Defendant:
KT Pro Tools, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
