Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Jeffrey Goodwin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 24-1852
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. GOODWIN, n his capacity as trustee of the Dorothy M. Goodwin Trust
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, d/b/a Chase Bank
Goodwin et al v. The Johns Hopkins University et al
as 1:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
CUTTING EDGE SURGICAL, INC. and Mark R Goodwin
Defendant:
The Johns Hopkins University, MUYINATU BELL and JOSHUA SHUBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goodwin (PS) v. Pueblo County District Court
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Goodwin
Respondent:
Pueblo County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOODWIN v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., N.A.
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R GOODWIN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Henderson v. Sutherland et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Defendant:
Ashley Sutherland, Clerk Kate Morgan, Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOODWIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11138
Plaintiff:
JAY R GOODWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodwin v. Chambers
as 1:2021cv03421
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Goodwin
Defendant:
Carol Smith Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillman et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Smith, David A. Gordon, John Bankston and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hillman et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2021at00433
Plaintiff:
Robert S White, Kurtis M Barnes, Debra L Johnson and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Petitioner:
Earl Aubrey, Jr.
Receiver:
Amanda Strain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodwin v. National Electrical Annuity Plan
as 1:2020cv01044
Defendant:
Quinn E. Goodwin, Quinn Elizabeth Goodwin, National Electrical Annuity Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
