Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Arvelo v. Corzine et al
as 1:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
Juan P. Arvelo
Defendant:
Jon S. Corzine, David P. Bolger, Martin J. Glynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Double D Trading, LLC v. Corzine et al
as 1:2011cv08271
Plaintiff:
Double D Trading, LLC
Defendant:
Jon S. Corzine, Henry J. Steenkamp, Bradley I. Abelow and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01575
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
MACDONALD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2010cv56745
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. MACDONALD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MACDONALD v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32974
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. MACDONALD
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MacDonald v. Rannikko et al
as 1:2009cv11578
Plaintiff:
Edward R. MacDonald
Defendant:
John Rannikko, Xtreme Flooring & Mfg. and Hercules Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
US v. Jeffrey MacDonald
as 08-8525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY R. MACDONALD
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT, THE INNOCENCE PROJECT and NORTH CAROLINA CENTER ON ACTUAL INNOCENCE
Riches et al v. MacDonald
as 1:2008cv00507
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Colette MacDonald
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. MacDonald et al
as 2:2007cv04095
Plaintiff:
Chalyn D. Perez
Defendant:
George R. MacDonald, George R. MacDonald, George R. MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
