Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MAGGITTI v. CAPUZZI et al
as 2:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN P. CAPUZZI, SR., CHRISTOPHER DEBARREN SAROBE, DANIEL R. ROLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61930
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R ROLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roland et al v. Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00212
Defendant:
High Mesa Services, LLC, Alta Mesa Resources, Inc., Alta Mesa Services, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roland, Randall Kauffman, Marcia Roland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv01439
Defendant:
Dr. Trost, Vasquez, Holly Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Quavotis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Agee v. City of McKinney, et al
as 14-40363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY AGEE, also known as Tony
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MCKINNEY, Texas, CHIEF DOUG KOWALSKY and WILLIAM R. ROLAND, also known as Randy
Roland v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Roland
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Thomas Schmalzried, M.D. and Does 1 through 20 inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Agee v. City of Mc Kinney, Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Anthony Agee
Defendant:
City of Mc Kinney, Texas , Doug Kowalski and William R. Roland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roland et al v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv06206
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Roland and Michele R. Roland
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Roland et al v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv06206
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Roland and Michele R. Roland
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
