Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SEITZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03259
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R SEITZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SEITZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04488
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R SEITZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SEITZ et al v. EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2016cv04130
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. SEITZ, III and HICKORY HILL GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP , EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , WINIFRED MORAN SEBASTIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klahn v. Wasco State Prison et al
as 1:2016cv00342
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Klahn, Sr.
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, John N. Katavich, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown, Sr. v. Seitz et al
as 1:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bay Brother Jul Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Tim R. Seitz, Claude Behealer and Stacy Kinkiad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. T. Seitz
as 14-6759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER T. R. SEITZ, #46, Vienna PD and VIENNA TOWN POLICE
Defendant:
ADAM GOLHA, Magistrate and STAN BARRY, Sheriff
Brown v. Seitz et al
as 2:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
T. R. Seitz, Adam Golha and Stan Barry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Goord, et al
as 1:1997cv07149
Plaintiff:
Nahshon Jackson
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord , George J. Bartlett , Christopher P. Artuz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kuntzman et al
as 1:2008cv00705
Plaintiff:
Rickey Williams
Defendant:
S. Kuntzman, R. Seitz and Merkel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
