Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wolfenbarger et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wolfenbarger and Jeffery Woods
Defendant:
R.D. Smith, Lyneal Wainwright, Gary C. Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Bunting et al
as 2:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Harold Combs
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Polly Schmalz, Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Bunting et al
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Harold Combs
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Lyon, Polly Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Young et al
as 3:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Walton
Defendant:
Jason Young, R.D. Smith, S. Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabel v. Bunting et al
as 3:2011cv02404
Plaintiff:
Kermit Gabel
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Tim Milligan, Constance Mosher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Victory v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-16187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Michael Victory v. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Woods v. Cashier's N. Sterlingnl MCI et al
as 3:2008cv01948
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Woods
Defendant:
Cashier's N. Sterlingnl MCI, Terry J. Collins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Beightler, et al
as 08-1873
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAN BECKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BEIGHTLER, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, DAVID H. SOUTER and others
ROSE v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
CARL ROSE
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, DAN DAVIS, MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
