Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Gomez Rapalo et al v. Cotton et al
as 4:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Ilsy Odet Gomez Rapalo and B. J. R.G.
Defendant:
Charles D. Cotton, Montgomery Transport LLC, Capacity Lease LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. R.G. Apel Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Defendant:
R.G. Apel Development, Inc., Marvin Dufner and Rene Dufner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(PC) Candler v. Caro
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Steven R.G. Candler
Defendant:
Abram Caro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Reed v. Gingerich et al
as 1:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Verrell Reed
Defendant:
Richard Gingerich, R.G. Limited, Terrence Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SIMMONS
as 2:2024cv04537
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R.G. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sciascia v. R.G. Hospital et al
as 6:2024cv06114
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sciascia
Defendant:
R.G. Hospital and Strong Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mickens v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Rashan Mickens
Defendant:
Sharon Clark, Heather Haldeman, A.J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
