Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Mandeville v. Kennedy
as 1:2023cv12123
Petitioner:
R.H. Mandeville
Respondent:
Steven Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard et al v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Corbyn Howard and R.H.
Defendant:
Kelly Fisher, Don Garab and Chad McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H.C. et al v. Chudzik et al
as 5:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
H.C., R.H., C.B. and others
Defendant:
Hon. Brian Chudzik, Hon. Edwin Tobin, Hon. Miles Bixler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Heisner et al
as 1:2020cv03070
Defendant:
Banks, MCC - Chicago, ABC Insurance and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Kiser et al
as 7:2019cv00633
Plaintiff:
Asiatic Royalprince Allah and Vernon Lee Brooks
Defendant:
James D. Lambert, Walter G. Swiney, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateen v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Khalif Abdul Mateen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Waverly Whitlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield W. Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dammones v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Ms. Happer, Mr. D/S Collins, B.L. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dammones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McCray v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv00612
Plaintiff:
Keith McCray
Defendant:
R. Baldoz, Joshua Garza, Jimmy Toh, R.H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
