Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02883
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01566
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DeJesus v. Ramirez
as 26-1202
Plaintiff:
JOSE DEJESUS
Defendant:
WALMART INC., WALMART STORES EAST, LP, RAFAEL RAMIREZ and others
Bolanos et al v. RMZ Transportation LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02958
Plaintiff:
Karen Acosta Yesenia Bolanos and Yesenia Bolanos
Defendant:
RMZ Transportation LLC, Rafael Ramirez and Sabrina Oronoz Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez-Calmo, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-2384
Petitioner:
NICOLAS RAMIREZ-CALMO, MIRIAM MARIBEL RAMIREZ-PABLO, I. M. R. P. and others
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guerrero Trinidad et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
as 1:2026cv00786
Plaintiff:
Alma Guerrero Trinidad and Rafael Ramirez Izarraras
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. and American Family Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ramirez v. Bondi
as 26-9512
Petitioner:
MARLIN RAFAEL RAMIREZ
Respondent:
PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General
Guerrero Trinidad et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I
as 1:2026cv00784
Plaintiff:
Alma Guerrero Trinidad and Rafael Ramirez Izarraras
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ramirez v. Blanche
as 25-7117
Petitioner:
RICARDO RAFAEL RAMIREZ
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.