Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Patel v. The United States et al
as 1:2021cv03376
Plaintiff:
The Excellent Raj Patel
Defendant:
The United States, The President of the United States, The Honorable Joe R. Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Patel v. The United States et al
as 1:2021cv03335
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
The United States, The President of the United States and The Honorable Joe R. Biden
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv02250
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOE R. BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv02219
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and JOE R. BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patel v. The United States
as 1:2021cv22729
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Patel v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv01345
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump, United States Military and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sara-Jane Parker, et al v. Laurence JenningsIn re: Sara-Jane Parker, et al v. Laurence Jennings
as 21-15746
Appellant:
LAURENCE JENNINGS and RAJ PATEL
Appellee:
SARA-JANE PARKER
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SARA-JANE PARKER
Patel v. Martinez et al
as 3:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, University of Notre Dame Du Lac, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL et al v. INFINITY MULTIVENTURES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv17266
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL, PARTHIVE PATEL, RAVPREET BHAMRA SINGH and others
Defendant:
VAIBHAV MANEK, SANJAY DAYMAN, INFINITY MULTIVENTURES INC. and others
Raj Patel v. Manisha Patel, et al
as 20-2713
Defendant / Appellee:
MANISHA PATEL, KARTIK PATEL, CHARMI PATEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJ PATEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
