Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Clark v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00311
Petitioner: Randall Wayne Clark
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10794
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RANDALL S CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Clarke
as 7:2019cv00411
Petitioner: Randall Wayne Clark
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Randall Clark
as 14-464
Movant: In re: RANDALL WAYNE CLARK
:
Rosales et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21897
Plaintiff: Melissa Rosales , Lisa Athans , William David Athans and others
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosales et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as TXN/3:13-cv-02911
Plaintiff: Melissa Rosales , Lisa Athans , William David Athans and others
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Rosales et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 3:2013cv02911
Plaintiff: Melissa Rosales , Lisa Athans , William David Athans and others
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Randall Wayne Clark
as 13-156
Movant: In re: RANDALL WAYNE CLARK
:
The Big Modesto Trust et al v. LPP Mortgage Ltd et al
as 4:2013cv00157
Plaintiff: The Big Modesto Trust and David M Wethy
Defendant: LPP Mortgage Ltd , Mary M Speidel , Robert L Negrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
White et al v. Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00346
Plaintiff: Donnie D White, Faygie Fields, Terrence M Love and others
Defendant: Yolande D Johnson, Gregory Lambert, Robin Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?