Cases 1 - 10 of 446
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Capehart v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Capehart
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections, Assistant Commissioner Georgia Department of Corrections and Wheeler Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 2:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, LT. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peery v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01813
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Peery
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
EVANS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00966
Petitioner:
RANDY LEE EVANS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Knapp v. Meadows
as 7:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Knapp
Defendant:
Mr. Larry Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Blevins et al
as 7:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Blevins, Pill Call Nurse, Lt. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capehart v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Capehart
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23709
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
