Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Clark et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Clark and Karen Lynn Clark
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. doing business as Clayton Homes of Hattiesburg, Clayton Homes, Inc., Southern Energy Homes, Inc. doing business as TRU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hopper v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00945
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Hopper, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. A. Harris
as 26-6914
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. HARRIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVIS, SERGEANT BLEVINS and others
Bivens v. Holzapfel
as 5:2026cv00502
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Bivens
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Blevins
as 26-6757
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS, NURSE CRYSTAL GILLEY, "Pill Call Nurse", LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Lassiter v. Uknown
as 7:2026cv00422
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Creech et al
as 7:2026cv00423
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
C/O Creech, C/O Ramey, Shephard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Masengill et al
as 7:2026cv00420
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Masengill, Sgt. Bentley, Dr. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Robbins et al
as 7:2026cv00421
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Robbins, Vanadore, Suit-up Team Goon-Squad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bivens v. USA
as 5:2026cv00112
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Bivens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
