Cases 31 - 40 of 264
Rankin v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv02016
Plaintiff:
William Dwayne Rankin
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center and Jackie McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. City of Florence et al
as 4:2021cv01711
Defendant:
Florence Sheriff, Magistrate Courts, City of Florence and others
Plaintiff:
William Dwayne Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Ball et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Defendant:
FNU McPherson, Mike Slayer, FNU Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Ball et al
as 5:2021ct03153
Defendant:
Warden Mike Slayer, Ms. Georgi, P.A. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Correctional Officer Singleton
as 21-6705
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY BENNETT, HALLOWAY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Levar Stoney
as 21-6675
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR LEVAR STONEY, Mayor of the City of Richmond VA, IVAN GILMORE, Warden of Sussex I State Prison, RICHARD CARSON VORHIS, Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court
as 21-6662
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RATZ, JOSEPH M. TEEFY, Judge, ATTORNEY TERRY DRISKILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Rankin Bey v. Medical Private Contractor
as 5:2021ct03095
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Medical Private Contractor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
