Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez Leiva et al v. Clute et al
as 4:2019cv00087
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Garcia Arroyo, Valentin Garcia Arroyo, Kimberly Delgado and others
Defendant:
Keith Clute, Shawn Nower and Windy Prairie Farm LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Association of Victims of Medical Malpractice et al v. Torres-Nieves
as 3:2012cv01812
Plaintiff:
Association of Victims of Medical Malpractice , Asdrubal Pascual , Raul Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Manuel A. Torres-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avina v. Scott et al
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
Paulino Avina
Defendant:
Elena Diaz, Raul Gonzalez, Jade Meeker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
AREVALO et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2011cv02339
Plaintiff:
NUVIA AREVALO , RAUL GONZALEZ , RUBEN GUEVARA and others
Defendant:
UMHP PROPERTIES INC, UMH SALES AND FINANCE and GAIL WHITTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Perez v City of Pharr, et al
as 7:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Javier Perez
Defendant:
City of Pharr, Texas, Federico Sandoval, Leopoldo Palacios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alberto San, Inc. v. Consejo de Titulares, et al
as 07-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO SAN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONDOMINIO CLINICA LAS AMERICAS, ROBERTO VELEZ, DANIEL GARAVITO-MEDINA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
