Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lopez-Cortez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2889
Petitioner:
RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
S. SALMONSON, WARDEN
Rodriguez et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Rodriguez and Raul Lopez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(HC) Lopez-Cortez v. Salmonson
as 2:2023cv03007
Petitioner:
Raul Lopez-Cortez
Respondent:
S. Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lopez v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Raul Lopez
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz-Sanchez v. Gonzalez-Seda
as 3:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Atty. Maritza Ortiz and Maritza Ortiz-Sanchez
Defendant:
Crisanta Gonzalez-Seda, Raul Lopez-Menendez, Dor Mari Arroyo-Carrero and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Raul Lopez-Alvarez
as 23-55442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ-ALVAREZ
Lopez Estrada v. Department of Labor and Industries
as 3:2023cv05354
Plaintiff:
Christian Raul Lopez Estrada
Defendant:
Department of Labor and Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(PS)Lopez Estrada v. Department of Labor and Industries
as 2:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Christian Raul Lopez Estrada
Defendant:
Department of Labor and Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez-Galeaz v. Garland
as 23-60057
Petitioner:
Jose Raul Lopez-Galeaz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
