Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas v. Ray/Roy Diaz Christina
as 1:2022cv20498
Plaintiff:
Wanda Thomas
Defendant:
Ray/Roy Diaz Christina, Denziel Maynard and Derek Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Ray/Roy Diaz Christiana et al
as 1:2022cv20068
Plaintiff:
Wanda Thomas
Defendant:
Ray/Roy Diaz Christiana et al, Derek Griffith and Ray/Roy Diaz Christiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dubner v. Roy et al
as 1:2014cv03993
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dubner
Defendant:
Daniel Ray Roy and Shenandoah's Pride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. David Roy
as 14-7406
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Roy v. USA
as 3:2014cv00602
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Ray Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SIMMONS v. PFIZER, INC.
as 3:2012cv04031
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DEWAYNE SIMMONS , DENISE MCCLINTIC , JUDITH DEPIPPO and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
US v. David Roy
as 12-6566
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Roy v. USA
as 3:2012cv00182
Petitioner:
David Ray Roy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. David Roy
as 11-7551
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
