Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-906
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Ellison v. Christensen
as 24-463
Petitioner:
ZONTA ELLISON
Respondent:
Warden DAVID CHRISTENSEN, Ray Brook
Brooks v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13306
Plaintiff:
Ray Brooks
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., Dabur International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curtis Brooks v. Tonya Chapman
as 23-6825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS RAY BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA D. CHAPMAN, Ex-Chair/Virginia Parole Board, KEMBA S. PRADIA, Ex-Vice Chair/Virginia Parole Board, A. LINCOLN JAMES, Ex-Member/Virginia Parole Board and others
Defendant:
RALPH NORTHAM, Ex-Governor/Chief Executive of Virginia
Gadson v. FCI Ray Brook
as 9:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Bernard Gadson
Defendant:
FCI Ray Brook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Curtis Ray Brooks
Respondent:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ray Brooks and Vivian D Brooks
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brooks v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Jason Ray Brooks
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. Chapman et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Brooks
Defendant:
Tonya D. Chapman, Kemba Smith Pradia, A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
