Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chhim v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2023cv04850
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chhim
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Equal Employment Opportunity Commision, Rayford O Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rayford v. Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC et al
as 1:2023cv13012
Defendant:
Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC, MPCM Services and Amanda Breasbois
Plaintiff:
Tonzania Rayford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rayford v. Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Tonzania Rayford
Defendant:
Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC, Amanda Breasbois and MPCM Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rayford v. Convergent Outsourcing, LLC
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Darlene Rayford
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, LLC and Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rayford v. KNM Holdings LLC
as 4:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Melinda Rayford
Defendant:
KNM Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rayford v. Triple J Logistics Management LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00274
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rayford
Defendant:
James K Martinolich, Jr and Triple J Logistics Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rayford v. Elihu, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv01174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rayford
Defendant:
Elihu, LLC , Carolyn Brayboy and Brayboy E. Elihu, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright v. Rayford's Food Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02525
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wright
Defendant:
Rayford's Food Service, Inc. and Kevin Rayford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rayford v. Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Louisiana, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00434
Defendant:
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Louisiana, Inc. and Goodworks Inc
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rayford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
