Cases 1 - 10 of 22
SUTTON v. TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv06528
Plaintiff:
Mr. JEFFREY SUTTON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, BLOOMFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN GARY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond Diaz Jr. v. State of California
as 2:2022cv06478
Petitioner:
Raymond Diaz, Jr.
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Diaz et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Raymond Diaz
Consolidated Plaintiff:
David H Ricks
Defendant:
Target Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, Target Corporation and Does 1 to 10
Consolidated Defendant:
Adrienne R Hahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Penzone
as 2:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Raymond Diaz
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv01967
Plaintiff:
Raymond Diaz
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa, County of and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terry v. Garnett et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Tom Lynch, Curtis Jones, Officer Strickler and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAS v. DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv10132
Defendant:
GARELICK FARMS, LLC, DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC., JOHN DOE 1-5 AND 6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DIAZ and RAYMOND DIAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54749
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02013
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NARANJO et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03143
Plaintiff:
CARMEN JOHN, DEREK MCDERMEIT, DEVAN DELGADO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
