Cases 21 - 30 of 64
United States of America v. Scott
as 6:2019cv06914
Defendant:
Raymond Scott
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Scott
as 1:2019cv01680
Defendant:
Raymond Scott
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
JENKINS-BERVINE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2019cv05545
Defendant:
REBECCA SCOTT CRAWFORD, REGIS SCOTT CRAWFORD, RACHAEL SCOTT CRAWFORD and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. JENKINS-BERVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kautantowit's Mecautea, et al v. State of Oregon, et al
as 3:2019cv01864
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Linn County Oregon Sheriffs Dept., Douglas County Oregon Sheriffs Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Kautantowit's Mecautea, Joy Maxine Graves, Timothy Paul Timm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Renwick, et al.
as 1:2019cv01452
Defendant:
Peter James Albert, Andre Ashley Craig, Gregory Eugene Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Scott
as 1:2019cv01207
Defendant:
Raymond Scott
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Wiseman et al v. Santiva, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01441
Defendant:
Santiva, Inc and Raymond Scott Henning
Plaintiff:
Cary W. Wiseman and Rosemarie C. Wiseman
SCOTT v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2019cv00580
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SCOTT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv20181
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Madill v. Tidwell et al
as 2:2018cv00814
Undetermined:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Defendant:
FNU Hallam and FNU Tidwell
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott Madill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
