Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Garfield v. Repinski
as 1:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Jon Garfield
Defendant:
Raymond Scott Repinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Scott v. The United States
as 6:2023cv06633
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mustafanos v. Aberasturi et al
as 3:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Yosef Leroi Mustafanos
Respondent:
Leon Aberasturi, Mordechai S. Lavi, Nevada Health Care System and others
Defendant:
Jeanine M. Ryder, Aaron Ford, Jason M. Frierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MORRISON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SCOTT MORRISON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
QUINN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03598
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SCOTT QUINN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59472
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nancy Fiedler et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv07065
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fiedler, Matthew Guiney, Olga Faynshteyn and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Scott v. The United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv06255
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
Brad Parker, Benjamin Kabot, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
