Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. The United States
as 6:2023cv06633
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mustafanos v. Aberasturi et al
as 3:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Yosef Leroi Mustafanos
Respondent:
Leon Aberasturi, Mordechai S. Lavi, Nevada Health Care System and others
Defendant:
Jeanine M. Ryder, Aaron Ford, Jason M. Frierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Scott v. The United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv06255
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
Brad Parker, Benjamin Kabot, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. East Grand Rapids Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2020cv01262
Defendant:
East Grand Rapids Department of Public Safety, Bethany Moore, Collin Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Wise
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
JENKINS-BERVINE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2019cv05545
Defendant:
REBECCA SCOTT CRAWFORD, REGIS SCOTT CRAWFORD, RACHAEL SCOTT CRAWFORD and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. JENKINS-BERVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Renwick, et al.
as 1:2019cv01452
Defendant:
Peter James Albert, Andre Ashley Craig, Gregory Eugene Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adame et al v. McLane
as 4:2015cv02175
Plaintiff:
Robert Adame, Steven Alvarez, Paul Ayala and others
Defendant:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2011cv02411
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott
Defendant:
City of Cleveland and James Belle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
