Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TISDALE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
NAISHA TISDALE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BROTHERS, KEVIN RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2021cv04357
Plaintiff:
Judd Andrews and Rebecca Andrews
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GHOLSON v. ANDREWS et al
as 2:2018cv01632
Defendant:
REBECCA ANDREWS and ZACHARY KENNEDY
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
International Insurance Company of Hannover v. ACW Construction Inc., et al
as 4:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
International Insurance Company of Hannover
Defendant:
ACW CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California Corporation, Richard Andrews and Rebecca Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
French v. Corizon et al
as 1:2014cv02263
Plaintiff:
Mark French
Defendant:
Corizon, Colin Ottey, Ava Joubert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Bishop et al
as 8:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, J. Krumpach, Rebecca Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. FANELLI et al
as 2:2013cv06150
Plaintiff:
REBECCA ANDREWS
Defendant:
HANNAH R. FANELLI and CHRISTOPHER TIVALLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Henderson v. Yeager et al
as 1:2011cv00901
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Henderson
Defendant:
Ginger Yeager, J. P. Morgan , Engle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
