Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MIR v. BROD et al
as 2:2025cv04508
Plaintiff:
JEHAN ZEB MIR
Defendant:
BRUCE ALAN BROD, CHARLES A. CASTLE, MARILYN J. HEINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LOWE v. USA
as 5:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
REGINALD LOWE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Reginald Lowe
as 22-14299
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REGINALD LOWE
Rodrigues v. Lowe et al
as 4:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Corey Rodrigues
Defendant:
Reginald Lowe, Lewis Velasquez, Dakota Coston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lowe et al v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
as 2:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lowe, ludmilla belayev and Ludmila Belayev
Defendant:
Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mir v. Zucker
as 20-1659
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary Gitnick, In Individual; Personal and Official Capacity, Joshua A. Bardin, In Individual, Personal, Capacity, Marian Goldstein, In Personal and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jehan Zeb Mir
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Donald Welch, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 15-16598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD WELCH, ANTHONY DUK and AARON BITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, DENISE BROWN, Case Manager, Director of Consumer Affairs, in her official capacity, HARRY DOUGLAS and others
Amicus Curiae:
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
