Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Robert Reiger v. Dwight Nevens, et al
as 17-16179
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT M. REIGER
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVENS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILLIAMS v. RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.J. et al
as 1:2017cv01797
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.J., UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE (UCHC), UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY (UMDNJ) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vice v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04127
Plaintiff:
Derek Vice
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Darrin Young, Bob Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04110
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Douglas Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Bob Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brent Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Barak Obama, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elam v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Hillard Elam
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Westville Correctional Facility , Corizon Health Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center et al
as 4:2015cv01346
Plaintiff:
Alfred Domenick Wright
Defendant:
Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions, Director Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony A. Kenyon v. Warden Dooley, et al
as 14-2966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tony A. Kenyon
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden Dooley, Department of Health, Dr. Reiger and others
Sund v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Sund
Defendant:
Carpenter, Board of Director's, Dr. Reiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenyon v. Dooley et al
as 4:2013cv04109
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Kenyon
Defendant:
Warden Dooley, Department of Health, Dr. Reiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
