Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Amaru v. Rhome Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
Qukulkhan Shahbaz NagaQiX Amaru
Defendant:
Rhome Police Department, Mark Moore and NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Amaru v. Rhome Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv02482
Plaintiff:
Mulukah Wakchan Xi Amaru
Defendant:
Rhome Police Department, Mark Moore and NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rhomes v. Mecca Auto LLC
as 3:2021cv01360
Plaintiff:
Davante Rhomes
Defendant:
Mecca Auto LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
In re: New York City Board of
as 20-503
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cynthia Rhome
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Cassie Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 19-7294
Defendant / Appellee:
S. MONAGHON, Deputy, LORI RHOME, Major, STOY, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Beckner v. Rhome et al
as 1:2019cv00860
Defendant:
Norris, Rhome and Grimes
Plaintiff:
Zacharian C. Beckner and Zachariah C. Beckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00734
Defendant:
Sgt. Adcok, Co. Redding, CpL Minnick and others
Plaintiff:
Cassie C. Crisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
