Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Ramirez Romero, Jose R. v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60875
Plaintiff:
Jose Ricardo Ramirez Romero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ramirez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jose Ramirez Romero
as 23-11188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE RICARDO RAMIREZ ROMERO
Estrella v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Antonio Corrillo Estrella
Defendant:
Ricardo Ramirez and Nye County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Ricardo Ramirez
as 22-30205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICARDO RAMIREZ
Grizzle v. Mcintire
as 22-11193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Roberts v. Lozada
as 22-11175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrea Lozada, Warden I, TDCJ-Institutional Division, David Reed, Jr., Assistant Warden, TDCJ-Institutional Division, Ricardo Ramirez, Major of Corrections Officer, TDCJ-Institutional Divison and others
Ramirez v. Wright Tree Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Defendant:
Wright Tree Service, Inc., ITC Holdings Corp., ITC Midwest, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
