Cases 31 - 40 of 500
Drake v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02636
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Frederick W. Smith, Molly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. City of Wabash et al
as 3:2021cv00482
Plaintiff:
Richard D Smith
Defendant:
Drew Bender, Wabash City of, Wabash County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. City of Wabash et al
as 1:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
Richard D Smith
Defendant:
City of Wabash, Drew Bender, Wabash County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23017
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHRISTIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SG GAMING INC v. SLOT TRADERS INC et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
SG GAMING INC
Defendant:
RICHARD MICHAEL SMITH, JR and SLOT TRADERS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Specialized IRA Services, LLC v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Specialized IRA Services, LLC
Defendant:
Powell Avenue Holdings, LLC and Richard W Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
SPENCER v. RICHARD et al
as 1:2021cv05111
Defendant:
WARDEN SMITH T. RICHARD, ALAN DIAS and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. SPENCER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Futch et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Jackson County Circuit Court, David Futch and Wendy Neviels
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIBIASE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv02679
Defendant:
OFFICER ROWE, WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH, ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R. DIBIASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
