Cases 1 - 10 of 1,168
BLANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
RODIA BLANTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
John Hawkins v. Tonya Conley, et al
as 24-1880
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS, also known as JOHN ANTHONY HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
TONYA CONLEY, DONNY BETZNER and RICHARD BROWN
Natbony v. Gabriel Resources, Ltd. et al
as 9:2024cv80630
Plaintiff:
William Natbony
Defendant:
Gabriel Resources, Ltd., Dragos Tanase, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
United States of America v. Brown
as 24-1227
Defendant:
MARK RICHARD BROWN and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
