Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chapman v. Cain
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Richard Chapman
Defendant:
M.D.O.C. Authority Bird Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Richard Chapman
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mike Woronko, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 22-1849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE WORONKO, MICHAELKE WORONKO, RYAN CIRIGNANO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Bazzrea et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Michael Bazzrea, Sabrina Wilder, Courtney Cheatum and others
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Commandant Linda Fagan, Secretary Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Hannah Allen, Lars Anderson, Cassidy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vekaria v. MThree Corporate Consulting, Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Jitendra Vekaria
Defendant:
MThree Corporate Consulting, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ECI Partners LLC and others
NEGRIN v. CHAPMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Defendant:
RICHARD CHAPMAN, CAPTAIN BUSTER KING and NURSE TINA DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
