Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
CRUZ v. KING et al
as 1:2023cv01980
Plaintiff: ARTEMIO CRUZ
Defendant: RICHARD KING, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Tascosa Office Machines, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00676
Plaintiff: Mark Smith
Defendant: Tascosa Office Machines, Inc., Byron Mitchell, Richard King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv10911
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miarka v. City Of Gulf Shores et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00243
Defendant: Paul Maliska, City Of Gulf Shores and Richard King
Plaintiff: Kamil Miarka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv01488
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04928
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06337
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Bell v. County Of Galveston et al
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff: Sheila Renee Bell
Defendant: County Of Galveston, Dwight D Sullivan, Secretary of State (Texas) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00954
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff: BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant: COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?