Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Price v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02632
Plaintiff:
Richard Price
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Price v. McGlofflin et al
as 3:2026cv00808
Plaintiff:
Richard Price
Defendant:
Officer T. McGlofflin and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hageman, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
as 24-7823
Plaintiff:
LISA PAGE, BRENDA HAGEMAN, LOUELLA WILSON and others
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC.
BRYSON v. PRICE et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Defendant:
ALLIGOOD, RICHARD PRICE, JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRYSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Price v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01336
Petitioner:
Scott Richard Price
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Price v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01229
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Price and Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brenda Hageman et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 8:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hageman, Richard Price and Timothy Sage
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(HC) Price v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00731
Petitioner:
Scott Richard Price
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
