Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Steward v. USA
as 3:2022cv01960
Petitioner:
Richard Steward
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jean-Louis et al v. Steward et al
as 1:2019cv02367
Plaintiff:
Gladys Jean-Louis and Laureen Jean-Louis
Defendant:
Richard Steward and J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Miller v. Steward et al
as 4:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Reco Miller
Defendant:
Richard Steward, Stacey Patterson and Derick Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2015cv00891
Plaintiff:
Akeem Bey
Defendant:
Tennessee, State of, Cheryl Blackburn, Gloria Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANDOLFO et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05824
Plaintiff:
FRANK PANDOLFO , VICTOR MANUEL PARGAS , ZAIDA M. PARKER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stapleton v. Noel et al
as 4:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Boss Stapleton
Defendant:
Faye Noel, Richard Steward, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pandolfo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03100
Plaintiff:
Frank Pandolfo , Victor Manuel Pargas , Zaida M Parker and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEWARD v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66321
Plaintiff:
ALFRED RICHARD STEWARD
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. , 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS SALES, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steward v. Bayer CropScience, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv03350
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc. , 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Richard Steward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
