Cases 1 - 10 of 68
English v. Crochet et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Atty Larry English and Larry English
Defendant:
Atty Vicki Crochet, Robert W. Barton, Taylor Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Robert Barton v. USA
as 23-11162
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM BARTON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KOCHMER et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FRANCIS JAY KOCHMER, JR., CONNOR ROBERT MERLINO-BARTON, RAYMOND DUHAIME and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Barton v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Barton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Robert John Barton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Eat Me Lures Inc. v. Cafepress LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01406
Defendant:
Phillip Millner, Fred E. Durham, Robert D. Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Eat Me Lures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
(PC) Castaneda v. Barton et al
as 1:2020cv01088
Defendant:
Virginia Media, Stu Sherman, Wayne Motl and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Castaneda v. Barton et al
as 2:2020cv01551
Defendant:
Virginia Media, Stu Sherman, Wayne Motl and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55476
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J BARTON JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
