Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Smith v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv04820
Petitioner:
Robert Davis Smith, Jr and Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Washoe County et al
as 2:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Robert Lonnell Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Washoe County, Darin Balaam, P. Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Robert Lonnell Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Benjamin Rhodes, Reno Police Department and Aaron Flickinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH LAW FIRM, PLLC et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
SMITH LAW FIRM, PLLC and ROBERT ALLEN SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ALEX GORSKY and DOMINIC J. CARUSO
Moss v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01026
Plaintiff:
JATOON MOSS
Defendant:
MARK INCH, WILLIAM JEFFREY JERRELS, JOHN NETTLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. County of Washoe et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Darin Balaam, Mosley, Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lonnell Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00538
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
