Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Maxwell's Pic-Pac, Inc. et al v. Vance et al
as 3:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Maxwell's Pic-Pac, Inc. and Food With Wine Coalition, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Vance , Tony Dehner and Danny Reed
Intervenor_defendant:
Liquor Outlet, LLC, d/b/a The Party Source
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniels v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2010cv00843
Plaintiff:
Dominick Lavar Daniels
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Robert Vance and Robert Vance
Defendant:
The Ohio National Life Insurance Company, The Ohio National Life Insurance Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vance v. HFS-USA, Inc.
as 8:2008cv02173
Plaintiff:
Robert Vance
Defendant:
HFS-USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PALMER, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75302
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VANCE PALMER
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Robert Vance Poutre Sr v. W.J. Sullivan
as 5:2008cv00421
Petitioner:
Robert Vance Poutre, Sr
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zornes v. Palmquist et al
as 2:2007cv00751
Petitioner:
Robert Vance Zornes
Respondent:
Robert J Palmquist, Robert E McFadden and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zornes v. USA
as 2:2007cv00074
Petitioner:
Robert Vance Zornes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dandridge et al v. Jefferson Parish School Board et al
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dandridge , Mary R. Landry , Robert Vance and others
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish School Board and Paul J. Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
