Cases 1 - 10 of 32
United States of America v. Whyte (Sarcia)
as 23-6015
Defendant:
ANTHONY WHYTE, ROYSHAWN ALLGOOD, NIREN DAVIS and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
AMY SARCIA
USA v. Robert Winston
as 22-1399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT WINSTON
United States of America v. Whyte (McClellan)
as 21-1006
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Bryon McClellan, AKA Brian McClellan
United States of America v. Whyte (Gregor)
as 21-603
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Benjamin Gregor
United States of America v. Whyte (Gregor)
as 20-4214
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Benjamin Gregor
(PS) Olson v. Bynum et al
as 2:2020cv02481
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Olson
Defendant:
Robert Puckett, Sr., Laura Bynum and Robert Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Whyte (Gregor)
as 20-3036
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Benjamin Gregor
United States of America v. Whyte
as 20-313
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Whyte, AKA Jak Mac
Peter Harrell v. Clint Dingman, et al
as 19-17116
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WINSTON, HORNBROOK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, CLINT DINGMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
(PS) Harrell v. Dingman et al
as 2:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Clint Dingman, Peter Kampa, Hornbrook Community Services District and others
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
