Cases 41 - 50 of 2,678
ROBINSON v. STATE OF DELAWARE DNB# 037802962
as 2:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF DELAWARE DNB# 037802962
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. PRICE
as 2:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
STARLESE NICOLE PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. One 1962 Aero Twin Commander 500B, Tail No. N37CK,
as 24-1277
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE 1962 AERO TWIN COMMANDER 500B, TAIL NO. N37CK, SERIAL NO. 500A-1251-76
Claimant:
RUSSELL ROBINSON
Costa et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Stacy Costa, Nathaniel Guerrero, Missy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HAWK et al v. HEALTHEC, LLC
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
KENDALL HAWK, LISA BRYSON, TRINITY WHALEY and others
Defendant:
HEALTHEC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ROBINSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DNB# 933882784 et al
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DNB# 933882784 and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. STATE OF DELAWARE DNB#037802962
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF DELAWARE DNB#037802962
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Deery et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Zha'Keirah Robinson
Defendant:
Detective Timothy Deery and Unknown CID Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
