Cases 1 - 10 of 2,224
United States v. Phillip Rogers
as 24-1904
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip Lanell Rogers
Huffman v. MidAmerica Hotels Corporation
as 4:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Roger Huffman
Defendant:
MidAmerica Hotels Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lobley v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Terrell Onterial Lobley
Respondent:
Don Harris
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
Yvette Rogers
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Murphy v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Larry Darnell Murphy
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arab v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Abdirizak Mursal Arab
Respondent:
State of Iowa and Woodbury County, Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gines v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Tommy Gines, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
