Cases 1 - 10 of 15
STONE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20534
Plaintiff:
ROLAND JAMES STONE, IV
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhem, et al v. Nautilus Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02101
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rhem and Roland James, Jr.
Defendant:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Reine v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00440
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
ROLAND JAMES REINE and Roland J Reine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Roland Bailey
as 16-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Roland James Bailey, also known as Toughman
Radcliffe v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00180
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roland James Radcliffe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rowland v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2014ct03327
Plaintiff:
Ernest Rowland
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kenny Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv03848
Plaintiff:
Roland James
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rudolph Decambra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73573
Petitioner:
RUDOLPH DECAMBRA, AKA Anthony Decambra, AKA Rudolph Anthony Decambra, AKA Rudy Decambra, AKA Roland James, AKA Andrew Lyon, AKA Ray Wilson
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Roland Bailey
as 11-3111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Roland James Bailey
Vernon Maxwell et al v. National Football League
as 2:2011cv08394
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp, Easton-Bell Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Anderson, Wanda Anderson, Donald Bessillieu and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
