Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Romer v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
George Albert Romer, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
US v. George Romer, Jr.
as 21-4614
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE ALBERT ROMER, JR.
Bauer et al v. Summey et al
as 2:2021cv02952
Plaintiff:
Sean Bauer, Giovanni Brown, Alexis Chavez and others
Defendant:
R. Keith Summey and City of North Charleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Romer et al v. McNair Law Firm PA et al
as 6:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Edward W Van Romer and Basic Concepts Inc
Defendant:
McNair Law Firm PA and Cort Flint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Van Romer et al v. Argonaut Inflatable Research and Engineering Inc
as 8:2010cv02649
Plaintiff:
Edward W Van Romer and Basic Concepts Inc
Defendant:
Argonaut Inflatable Research and Engineering Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Van Romer et al v. Husky Portable Containment Company
as 8:2010cv02209
Plaintiff:
Edward W Van Romer and Basic Concepts Inc
Defendant:
Husky Portable Containment Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Romer et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2010cv01884
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth M. Romer and Brian Frankel
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edward Van Romer v. Interstate Products, Incorpora
as 10-1506
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD W. VAN ROMER and BASIC CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
INTERSTATE PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED
Movant:
READY CONTAINMENT
Weinman v. Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
as 3:2007mc00204
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Weinman
Defendant:
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund, Mohsen Abrishami, Elham Shaikhy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
