Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith (PS) v. Ghiassi et al
as 1:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Smith
Defendant:
Maryam Ghiassi, Maryam Ghiassi 's Assistant and Kim Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ronald R. Smith v. Jamie Baker, et al
as 18-1832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BAKER and LIEUTENANT TUSCY
Ronald Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prison Medic
as 14-3323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON MEDICAL STAFF AND ET. AL.
SMITH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON MEDICAL STAFF AND ET. AL.
as 2:2013cv04845
Plaintiff:
RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON MEDICAL STAFF AND ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mansfield et al
as 5:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Smith
Defendant:
Marc Mansfield, Francis T Jarvis, Ashley Todd Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Smith v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-2011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DWIGHT SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA A. CARUSO, DENNIS STRUB, CATHERINE BAUMAN and others
Smith #656788 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwight Smith #656788
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis Strub, Catherine Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #656788 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwight Smith #656788
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis Strub, Catherine Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #656788 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwight Smith #656788
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso and Dennis Straur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
