Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Smith v. Baker et al
as 5:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Ronald Richard Smith
Defendant:
Lt. Baker, Lt. Tuscy, Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Holland
as 5:2017hc02032
Petitioner:
Ronald Edward Smith
Respondent:
J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Lamont
as 8:2016cv03651
Plaintiff:
Ronald K. Smith
Defendant:
Herbert C. Lamont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Gulf South Medical Supply et al
as 1:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Gulf South Medical Supply, PSS World Medical, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver:
Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Smith, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6860
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD DEVON SMITH, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD E. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2012cv00577
Petitioner:
Ronald Devon Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director of the Department of Corrections
as 2:2012cv00578
Petitioner:
Ronald Devon Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Harold E. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012hc02116
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Smith
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
