Cases 111 - 120 of 224
Williams v. Maiben et al
as 1:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Willie Maiben, Travis W. Grant, Jill Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016mc01154
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Williams v. McDowell et al
as 3:2016cv00338
Defendant:
Kryen Brown, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Earl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuggle v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06592
Plaintiff:
Tara Tuggle , James Kennedy , Belinda L. Clifford and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. LAYTON
as 1:2016cv00885
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON and UNKNOWN DEPUTIES
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. WILLIAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ratner v. McNerney et al
as 1:2016cv03589
Plaintiff:
Ratner and Jason Ratner
Defendant:
McNerney, James W. McNerney, Jr., Dennis A. Muilenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. 1st Judicial District Court et al
as 5:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ronald Earl Williams
Defendant:
1st Judicial District Court and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. RIGSBY
as 2:2016cv00030
Defendant:
RIGSBY
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
